体育与科学

本文以传统体育文化的主体性危机与创造性转化为核心议题，通过与杨文轩教授的学术对话，探讨传统体育文化主体性的内涵、现实困境及重建路径。研究认为，传统体育文化的主体性源于实践主体持续不断的文化创造，体现为人的能动实践、文化基因的赓续以及文化自主发展的能力，是一个在历史传承与现实情境交织中不断进行价值建构与意义再生产的动态过程。当前，其主体性主要面临全球化背景下价值认同迷失、城市化进程中实践场域解体、工具理性扩张导致的文化内核异化以及代际传承断裂等困境。针对上述问题，本文提出主体性创造性转化的三重路径：认识论上重建文化主体自觉，重构以人为本的价值认知；方法论上推进传统体育文化的现代转译，构建多维传播体系；实践论上重建生活实践场域，培育文化实践共同体，提升传统体育文化政策的适应性治理能力，为传统体育文化主体性的持续生成提供现实支撑。

This article takes the crisis and creative transformation of the cultural subjectivity of traditional sports culture as its central concern. Through an academic dialogue with Professor YANG Wenxuan, it examines the connotations of cultural subjectivity in traditional sports culture, the challenges it currently faces, and possible pathways for its reconstruction. The study argues that the cultural subjectivity of traditional sports culture originates from the continuous cultural creation of practicing subjects. It is manifested in human agency, the continuity of cultural genes, and the capacity for autonomous cultural development, constituting a dynamic process of value construction and the continuous reproduction of cultural meaning across historical inheritance and contemporary contexts. At present, its cultural subjectivity is confronted with multiple challenges, including the erosion of cultural identity in the context of globalization, the disintegration of practical cultural spaces amid urbanization, the alienation of cultural essence under the expansion of instrumental rationality, and disruptions in intergenerational transmission. In response, this article proposes a threefold framework for the creative transformation of cultural subjectivity. At the epistemological level, it advocates rebuilding cultural self-consciousness and reconstructing a people-centered value orientation. At the methodological level, it emphasizes advancing the modern translation of traditional sports culture to enhance cultural innovation and building a multidimensional communication system. At the practical level, it calls for reconstructing everyday spaces for cultural practice, cultivating communities of cultural practice, and enhancing the capacity for adaptive governance in traditional sports culture policy, thereby providing practical support for the sustained reproduction of the cultural subjectivity of traditional sports culture.