体育与科学

本文以中国体育社会学自主知识体系的建构为研究主线，运用文献资料法，归纳了其知识生产的4类本土理论渊源，在既有研究中提炼出7个概念群及相应的中层分析工具，并概括了贯通3个层次的叙事结构。本文指出，中国体育社会学自主知识体系的形成可概括为“树”的知识生产结构：以中国体育思想传统与相关社会科学资源为“根”,深层塑造提问方式与解释取向；以贯通“宏观—中观—微观”的“结构—过程—实践”叙事结构为“干”,将国家体育战略与发展、体育制度与组织运作，以及日常生活的具身实践联结起来，使多层次经验得以整合；以可共享、可复用、可更新的概念群与中层工具箱为“冠”,为议题展开与学术交流提供可对接的话语基础和解释工具。本文进一步指出，中国体育社会学的“自主性”并非对其“本土性”的自我证明，更不是“本土/外来”的二元对立选择，而是一种面向中国情境中的体育问题的自觉取向与可持续的结构化叙事与解释力。未来体育社会学研究可围绕中国式现代化、共同富裕与具身日常生活等议题深化经验分析，强化反例检验与跨情境比较，在中国经验基础上提炼可对话、可比较、可迁移的理论表达，从而推动知识体系的迭代生长。

This article centers on the construction of an autonomous knowledge system in the sociology of sports in China. Drawing on a literature-based approach, it identifies four categories of indigenous theoretical sources underpinning knowledge production, distills seven concept clusters and their corresponding mid-range analytical tools from existing scholarship, and summarizes a three-level narrative structure that links different analytical scales. The article argues that the formation mechanism of this autonomous knowledge system can be captured through a “tree-like” structure of knowledge production: As the “roots”, traditions of sport-related thought and relevant social-scientific resources that profoundly shape modes of inquiry and explanatory orientations; as the “trunk”, a “structure-process-practice” narrative framework spanning the macro, meso, and micro levels, connecting national sport strategy and development, institutional and organizational operations in sport, and embodied practices in everyday life, thereby enabling the integration of multi-level empirical materials; and as the “crown”, shareable, reusable, and updatable concept clusters and a mid-range analytical toolbox that provide commensurable discursive foundations and explanatory instruments for problem setting and scholarly communication. It further argues that “autonomy” in Chinese sociology of sports is neither a self-justification of its “indigeneity” nor a binary choice between the “local” and the “foreign”, rather, it is a reflexive orientation toward sport-related problems in the Chinese context and a sustainable capacity for structured narrative and explanation. Future research may deepen empirical analysis on themes such as Chinese modernization, common prosperity, and embodied everyday life, strengthen counterexample testing and cross-context comparison, and develop theoretically expressible formulations grounded in China's experience that are dialogic, comparable, and transferable, thereby promoting iterative growth of this knowledge system.